Increasing Mig Tip Life with the ORIGINAL SILVER ALLOY High Electrical and Thermal Conductivity Copper Alloy Tips
The contact tip is one of the smallest and relatively inexpensive components in any GMAW welding system; yet it can be the source of catastrophic failure that results in production downtime and increased costs.
In most cases, the economic loses due to tip failures surpass many times the acquisition cost of these parts. Therefore production-welding manufacturers are in continuous search for tips capable of outperforming expectations in increasingly stringent production conditions and expectations of through put.
The primary function of a contact tip is to consistently transfer welding current to the filler wire as it passes through its center bore and makes electrical contact with the bore surface. Not surprisingly, electrical conductivity is essential and proportionate to the high performance of Silver Alloy contact tips.
Contact tips may fail in a number of different ways and quite often the root cause of failure can be linked to external factors [Figure 1].
Failures can range from those that result in some type of arc initiation failure (such as burn back, bad starts or arc instability) to those that result in erroneous weld deposition [Figures 1 & 2].
Both are failures that affect robotic and all welding manufacturers. Here, repeatability of the tool center point (TCP) is crucial to avoid costly robot re-programming.
One of the significant contributors of TCP error is known as “key-holing” (Figure 1); the continuous rubbing by the moving wire inside the tip bore at elevated temperatures eventually wears off the bore outlet. In sheet metal robotic welding applications, this may result in weld defects such as lack of fusion or burn-through.
Copper
has been the material of choice for many decades, primarily because,
after silver, it displays the second best electrical conductivity
amongst all metals (Figure 2).
However, due to its face centered
cube (f.c.c.) crystalline structure, pure copper is naturally
ductile.
Fortunately, copper can be strengthened by a number of
strengthening mechanisms including cold work, solid solution,
precipitation hardening and dispersion strengthening.
The most
popular and inexpensive copper alloy used in North America for
contact tips is CDA C12200 (P deoxidized copper).
Precipitation
hardening alloys such as C18100 (Cu-Cr-Zr), C18200 (Cu-Cr), C17510
(Cu-Be) have been common for high performing tips since generally
they tend to have higher physical wear performance than C12200.
Unfortunately, as most strengthening mechanisms,
precipitation-hardening compromises the electrical conductivity of
copper. Plant experience with these alloys has been mixed; in some
applications, they appear to work while in other applications there
is not clear difference with C12200 copper.
It is not all clear what are the exact
microscopic mechanisms that produce wear in contact tips.
Some
studies [Figure 3] have suggested that a relatively small region at the
bore outlet sustains most of the wear.
At this region current
densities and temperatures are high enough to promote electrical
erosion [3,4], abrasion and oxidation phenomena, which accelerates
wear.
Many of these phenomena are related to the effectiveness of
the electron transfer from the tip bore to the moving wire.
This effectiveness
depends to a large extent on the contact resistance at the bore.
Clearly, electrical conductivity appears to play a fundamental role
on the longevity of the contact tips. In this direction, there has
been research that supports the idea of increasing contact tip
endurance by using high electrical conductivity coppers.
Today, most commonly used copper alloys display
electrical conductivities of less than 85% IACS ; for example, the
electrical conductivity of alloy C17510 (Beryllium copper) can be as
low as 45% IACS. This new family of
copper-silver alloy, CuAgSP, displays electrical conductivity
of 98% IACS. much higher than any of the commercially available
alloys (Figures 3/4).
Expanding
on the standard silver-containing coppers, the composition of CuAgSP
has been tuned to produce the most economical and highly conductive
copper tip material available in the market today.
This alloy is
being currently used to produce high endurance contact tips, which
do not display arc instability or other electrical or thermal issues
that are common to the precipitation-hardening coppers described
above.
The superb performance appears to be related to both the low
service temperature and electrical resistance combined with highly
effective electrical conductivity and arc transfer both of which
greatly reduce erosion, arc instability and poor arc starting
characteristics.
Figure 4
Copper Alloy
Designation |
Composition% |
Softening
Temperature |
Electrical Conductivity
%IACS |
Hardness
HV |
Thermal Conductivity |
Electrical Resistance |
USA
UNS |
| Chromium
Zirconium |
Cu min 99+
Cr.65 Zr.08 |
500°C |
75 |
170 |
335 |
23 |
CrZr |
| Phosphorous
Deoxidized |
Cu min 99.9
P 0.015-.040 |
300°C |
85 |
115 |
335 |
20 |
DHP
C12200 |
| Silver Alloy |
Cu 99
Ag 0.8-1.2 |
400°C |
98 |
125 |
395 |
17 |
CuAg |
-
Figure 1: Keyholing due to
excessive tip wear
-
Figure 2: Electrical
conductivity of highly pure metals at room temperature
[5]
-
Figure 3: Electrical
conductivity of CuAgSP as compared to commonly used
contact tip alloys as well as ultra pure coppers [6].
-
Figure 4: Comparative
properties of available contact tip alloy
REFERENCES
1. J. Villafuerte, "Understanding Contact Tip Longevity of Gas Metal
Arc Welding", Welding Journal, 78, 12, 1999, pp 29-35
2. J. Villafuerte, "Dispersion Strengthened Copper For Heavy Duty
Torch Tips And Electrode Caps", Weld. J, Nov 2003, Vol. 82, No. 11
3. Yamada T., Takana O., Weld. J., vol 66, no9, 1987, 35-42
4. Thier H., Polrolniczak H., Schreiber S.: Schweissen und Schneiden,
vol.47, no.5. May 1995. pp.356, 358, 360-362, 365 (English
translation of text and captions pp.E88-E90)
5. E.A. Brandes, G.B. Brook; Smithells Metals Reference Book, 7th
edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992, p19-1
6. Copper Development Association: Standards Handbook, 1985
Enter your email
address below to automatically receive this document in an Adobe
PDF. You can also send it to a friend.
|
|